The Rise of Shareholder Litigation in Delaware: What the Moelis Decision Means for Corporate Governance

Corporate governance in the United States is undergoing renewed scrutiny following a significant ruling from the Delaware Court of Chancery that has drawn considerable attention from corporate lawyers, investors, and startup founders alike. The decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company (2024) challenges the growing practice of granting expansive governance rights to founders and Continue reading

The “AI Lawyer” Lawsuit of 2026: When a Chatbot Allegedly Practiced Law

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence has already begun transforming many professional sectors, including law. In 2026, a lawsuit filed in federal court raised an unusual and somewhat ironic legal question: Can an AI chatbot effectively act as an unlicensed lawyer? The case has attracted widespread attention in legal circles because it sits at the intersection Continue reading

A Federal Court Challenges USCIS’s EB-1A “Final Merits” Test: A Turning Point for Extraordinary Ability Petitions

In January 2026, a federal court issued a decision that could significantly reshape how extraordinary ability immigrant petitions are adjudicated in the United States. The case, Mukherji v. Miller, challenges a long-standing practice used by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to deny EB-1A petitions even after applicants demonstrate that they meet the regulatory criteria. For Continue reading

MEMBERS – AMLA Lawyer to Speak about Ahmadi Muslims Persecutions in Pakistan

Episode of the USCIRF Spotlight Podcast, USCIRF Commissioner Stephen Schenck speaks with Amjad Mahmood Khan, a member of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Lawyers Association USA, about the current situation facing Ahmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan. Listen here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/criminalizing-faith-the-persecution-of-ahmadiyya/id1552052001?i=1000741586857&l=fr-FR

BRIEF – Uber’s Legal Tactics Raise Concerns About Access to Justice for Low‑Income Plaintiffs

Uber is facing criticism over its legal strategy to limit low‑income drivers and riders from suing the company, raising broader questions about access to justice and corporate accountability. The issue revolves around Uber’s use of mandatory arbitration clauses and class-action waivers in its contracts, which effectively prevent many individuals from taking disputes to court. (stanfordlawreview.org) What’s Happening In Continue reading